Tag Archives: Law

New Terms Added to Corporate Governance Vocabulary

2 Feb

I’ve added new terms to the list of Business or Corporate Governance Vocabulary

Don’t forget, the Chinese translations come from the Chinese students rather than professional translators. While I believe they are accurate, you may want to consult professionals before using them for official documents. This is mainly intended to contribute to daily conversation between English speaking Companies and Chinese companies.

Abbreviations:
v. = Verb
n. = Noun
adj. = Adjective
adv. = Adverb

(c) All Rights Reserved. You are welcome to use this material. However, if you do end up using these definitions in your material (educational, informational, or professional), please include either a link to this webpage or the following reference: Blessing, Olivia. “Corporate Governance Vocabulary.” DeceptivelyBlonde.com. This is for two reasons: 1) I’d like to share the resource with others. 2) I created these definitions myself. Thanks!

Continue reading

Bar Study Course Poll

18 Jan

Corporate Governance Vocabulary

31 Dec

Hello!

This semester I had the wonderful opportunity to introduce my International Business Management students to the concept of International Corporate Governance.  They had studied the idea of corporate governance the previous semester, but it revolved significantly around US rules and regulations.

This time, my goal was to expand their understanding of Business Management, Corporate Law, and Business Ethics to an international level. The ultimate plan was for the students to understand the international parties, rules, and features of Corporate Governance.  At the end, the students should be fully capable of doing the research and opening up legal, ethical corporations around the world.

Unfortunately, I teach ESL students; it quickly became clear that in order for the class to proceed some Corporate Governance-related vocabulary was necessary.  Since I know many other students suffer from the same problem, I have decided to share with you the same vocabulary I shared with my students!

In the interest of helping English-speaking teachers or businesspersons trying to use Chinese, I have also included the Chinese translations my students provided for the words.   While I cannot attest to the validity of the Chinese terms (I highly recommend you verify these terms in case you need to use them in an official capacity), perhaps they can help in general conversation. 🙂 If you find corrections, please let me know in the comments!  

I’ll be updating the vocabulary page regularly over the next 15 weeks or so with new words (about 20-30 a week). 

Click below to visit the Vocabulary Page

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE VOCABULARY

I’d love to know if this resources helps anyone out and how you use the vocabulary terms in your work!  

What to Do When you Fail the Bar Exam?

24 Oct

“Help! I failed the bar! Now what?”

If I had a penny for the number of times people have asked me this, I’d probably have a whole dollar.

No seriously, there is a difficult decision facing people who don’t quite make it past the bar exam’s tough standards.  I have a very close friend who was absolutely convinced that California was the state for her. She packed up and moved lock, stock, and barrel to LA hoping to start her dream of legalizing the state one case at a time. But after 3 very expensive tries at passing the Cali bar, she’s starting to lose hope.  

So what do you do? 

I can’t promise you I have all the answers. There for a while, I was pretty convinced I wasn’t going to make it past the exam myself. But, by the grace of God, here I am – a proud Iowa attorney.  So I haven’t exactly been where you are. Note however, that I had already started looking at non-law based jobs before I even took the exam, that’s how concerned I was. So I do understand your fears.  

There are a few options available to you. Most notably ~ 1) Re-take the Exam or 2) Find a different type of Law job or 3) Go another route.

1) If you’re going try the exam again, that’s great. I wish you all the best and the truth is, practice makes perfect. The more you study, the more you practice, the better you will be on the actual exam! A lot of people take the exam and pass it on their second try.  Many Bar Review programs will actually let you take the program again for free if you failed the exam the first time, so that fee isn’t going to be over your head.  There are many people out there willing to tutor you in essay writing, in exam taking strategies, etc. You actually could probably hire a private Bar Tutor online or in your area.  There are plenty of things you can do to improve your strategy. Obviously what you did the first time was insufficient, so do more.  Try new techniques, find online support and practice groups, find new ways to learn the law. I honest-to-God learned a lot of Evidence/Criminal law by watching “Murder One”–where the people followed most of the rules of evidence/objections and I could see how the rules developed or worked. A lot of fiction books are written by lawyers, so maybe find a few that include the rules of law that you are working on.

One note of warning– you will do worse on your second exam if you don’t continue studying and reviewing in the interim. A lot of repeaters say, oh I did great on contracts, so I don’t need to study that anymore. This so wrong I can’t even tell you. Wait 6 months and try to remember all those contracts rules again, you’ll find they’ve already started fading into memory. So you really should continue reviewing EVERYTHING, not just the stuff you didn’t do so well on.

2) Finding an alternative law job is probably the most difficult option of all to accomplish.  There are however, some types of jobs available to juris doctorates–even if some require additional training. For example, you could teach law (at home or abroad). The J.D. is technically a PhD, and there are several schools who won’t care about your bar scores as long as you can teach the topic. Now, teaching in America is probably more difficult, but there are a lot of schools internationally (High-school or College) that want professors of American Law.  Or you could advertise your skills as a Consultant. This is sort of like a lawyer, except you aren’t doing any of the paper work, courtroom actions, etc. And you have to be upfront on the lack of a license. But you do have a PhD in Law (J.D.) and you are qualified to discuss the topics.  Especially if you work in an alternative field and utilize the law as a supplement–work as a business consultant with the addition of a law degree.  Paralegals are sometimes paid even more than lawyers, and that doesn’t require a law degree at all.  Try out writing–many mystery writers start out as lawyers because they get experience in how criminal law works, maybe you could try your hand at it.  You could try being an administrator. There are some organizations that want to hire people aware of the law, but don’t really care if you have a license or not. Try working as a legal researcher. A lot of lawyers and legal websites need legal research done for them–you don’t need a law license, you just need to understand the law. As you can see, there are several options available to you. I’ll try to pull together a list for you to use something in the future.  But for now, try googling around for jobs requiring a J.D.  

3) Actually, a lot of people who do pass the bar are going this route as well–finding a different path.  This happens largely for two reasons–you aren’t good at law (let’s just agree that some people are not meant for the legal industry) or you generally dislike the field (it happens!).  Law is never going to be a completely worthless degree.  Businesspersons use it to create their contracts, protect their company, build start-ups, shutdowns, and more. Accountants use it to ensure they understand the field of banking/taxation and the rules that accompany those industries. Psychologists understand how to protect themselves and their patients. Politicians–well it’s obvious how they use the law. You get my point–you can do something completely different and still utilize your J.D.  

But sometimes, the law field itself is just not going to work for you. Maybe you figure out after the 3rd or 4th try that you’re never going to get past the exam. Maybe you finally take the exam and realize that law sucks–it’s boring, takes a ton of hours out of your life, destroys families, the judges/legal systems are biased and unfair, etc.  Some people take to the world of law like ducks to water. Others of us figure out that us practicing law is like a pussycat trying to be the champion diver in a competition field consisting of sharks.  It just isn’t meant to be. 

This is where my experience comes in. I actually passed the exam. I tried the law. I HATED it. Kudos to my friends who are extremely successful, but that was not going to be me. I could have been successful, but I figured out I didn’t really want to be–at least in that field. Now, have I abandoned my legal studies? NO! I am actually a law professor, legal researcher, and writer. I focus on the areas of law that actually interest me (Art Law & Cultural Heritage Law), rather than trying to force myself into a career as a Business lawyer or Family lawyer.  I like teaching so much better–in fact, I’m getting ready to pursue a MA and PhD in English Literature, where I might be writing about Law in Literature.  

If you are failing the exam over and over again, maybe you need to stop and think about your future. Is law really for you?  Is the future you see yourself in really worth all this stress, aggravation, and money?  I can’t promise you that once you get past the exam, everything will fall into place. If you had trouble memorizing and applying the civil procedure rules before the exam, you’re still going to have to do that in real life where the judges yell at you when you screw up.  It’s not like passing the exam is a magic thing that means you’ll automatically be good at law for the rest of your life.  No, you are still going to be tested on your law knowledge every time your stuff goes before a court. 

So take a step back. Stop trying to force yourself into a bubble that you just aren’t fitting into. What is it that you actually like about law? Money? Maybe you’d be better off going back and getting an accounting, engineering, business degree. The learning? Teachers have a lot more learning time.  Argumentation/Discussion?  Writing, Politics, Teaching government, Creating government policy–all of those include persuasion and arguments. There are a lot of fields out there that will let you use your law degree while still being more successful at something you love.  Yes, this may mean going back to school–and Lord knows, you’re tire of school. But most MAs take 1-2 years and can be shockingly affordable. A PhD may require 1-2 years of classes, but the rest is just writing your dissertation. It’s not like Law school, you can work your way through these programs. And some of your law classes might even transfer!  See what I mean, you have options.  Maybe the bar exam isn’t for you.

Whatever happens, just remember you have options.  If you want to take the exam again, that’s great! Check and see what help you can get for free (the options are better now)! But if you are starting to get depressed about your future, stop it. The bar exam isn’t the end of the world–there are lots of opportunities that work just perfectly without a silly bar certificate.  This exam is only to prepare you for one job. There are lots of other jobs available to you! And some might be even better!

Image

Good Luck Bar-Takers! Fighting!

29 Jul

Copyright: The Constitutional Background

14 Jul

***This is not intended to be legal advice. First, this is an ESL Primer, and so is fairly simplified. Second, each person’s situation is different.  Please contact your attorney for legal advice as it applies to you!! 

Copyright:

The Constitutional Background

by Profs. Olivia L. Blessing, JD and Angela K. Blessing, MBA, JD

 via “Cultured Muse

Introduction

When asked to think back to the American Constitution, many Americas recall dusty memories of political office age restrictions and voting laws. Yet, the founding fathers were not only devoted to taxes and wars; they were interested in cultural and scientific issues as well.

In fact, they considered art and inventions so important to American culture and development as to warrant Constitutional protection. In America, the Constitution is the highest law in the country, it trumps everything.  If it is in the Constitution, it is extremely important to the Government. And Copyright protection is one of those extra important issues the Government is involved in.

So what exactly does the Constitution say?  As we saw before, Article 1, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution says Congress has the power “to promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries.”

Cool! Now, what does that mean? Continue reading

Copyright v. Trademark v. Patent

22 Jun

abstract art idea

“The Sleeping Virtue” by MissNickiPink

To Be in Copyright or Not To Be in Copyright. . . That is the Question.

Here in China, I’m currently teaching my darling students Business Law, which includes a healthy dose of Art and Cultural Heritage law surprisingly enough.  Although, if you think about it, Businesses deal in Art and Words as much as anyone–and I’ve discovered the rules for them are often similar to those for individual artists.  

But one of the most basic questions my students get stumped with is what is the different between a copyright, trademark, and patent?  Many of them have created their own companies on the side and are trying to figure out how to protect their resources.  

Lawyers like to throw around those words like they mean something, but it’s a big pile of nothing for anyone else.  Still, many of your rights and protections are caught up in the relevant Copyright, Trademark, or Patent. So if you want to adequately protect yourself (in business or in art), you need to know what to do and what laws are on your side.  

As I help my students, I thought I would share some information here as well.  I’m teaching basic overview of the law, so this is all simple information 🙂  Please Note: This is not intended to be Legal Advice! Every situation is different, and if you have a situation you need to speak with your own Attorney! Continue reading

When the State Drops The Ball

6 May

I just received an update from my Young Lawyers Division – Iowa’s House has (apparently without much warning) approved a bill that drops the salary of lawyers doing criminal defense work for the state – from $60/hr to $25/hr. (See  SF 497).

For those unfamiliar with the legal system of America, the 6th Amendment states that criminal defendants (people accused of a crime) have the right to an attorney. 

You’ve heard the Miranda Rights given on TV – “You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford one, one will be provided for you.”  Good old Law & Order, coming through once again!

So, if you have the right to an attorney but a serious lack of money, who does this “providing of lawyers”? — In short, the state courts do.  

There are a whole series of lawyers who take on work from the state defending the accused criminals who cannot afford a lawyer on their own.  These lawyers are often young, self-employed, looking for experience, and desperate for money to pay the bills until they get a job with an official firm. 

It is with this understanding that the problem with the salary decrease become apparent.  These lawyers already have a hard time affording the legal costs at $60/hr.  

Last year, I worked with a Solo Practitioner doing this type of work for the state.  The costs (gas, printing, filing fees, travel costs, lost profits, etc.) for the lawyers are ridiculously high in comparison with the salary.  Even at $60/hr, it is a struggle to make more than they spend doing the job.

Of course, the courts also have a maximum on the number of hours you can claim in the end, and that standard was consistently far lower than the time actually spent preparing and defending the case.  So, that same $60 (or $25 at the new rate) actually spreads out over more than an hour. It all adds up to a pretty penny.

Lawyers were already vastly unhappy with the 60$ an hour salary, and there has been significant clamoring for a raise for some time.  Instead, the House has gone the opposite direction. 

As someone with experience in this type of law, let me say, $25/hr isn’t going to come even close to cutting it. There is no way that will pay for all the losses the lawyers experience in doing the work. 

Naturally, the first response for the lawyers would be to refuse this type of work in the future.

Ah, but here we have a more significant problem – at what point is the State interfering with the 6th Amendment rights and Due Process?  By decreasing the salary so much that no one can afford to take on the work, they have taken away the lawyers for the criminal defendants.

The future in this situation is easily predictable – this would go one of three ways.  Naturally, as lawyers stop taking on the work, there will eventually come a time where there are not enough lawyers to handle the work-load.  Now, 1) the state will have to raise the salary to entice lawyers back, making the new bill pointless;  2) the state will have to set aside the defendant’s right to an attorney and begin holding trials without lawyers present (setting a frightening precedent); or 3) the state will have to  drag things out until the 1-2 lawyers who do this out of their own kind hearts have time to show up.  

Why do we even have this right to due process and a lawyer in the first place? As I told my Business Law students recently, there is a significant risk inherent in the criminal law system. A state-based judge handling a case brought by a state-attorney in the name of the state/local police = a criminal trial.  And the only person in this system that doesn’t know what the rules are or how to adequately handle the process is the defendant who’s life, liberty, and money are on the line.  

How is that fair in any way, shape, or form? Even my ESL students knew this answer – It’s not.  It’s a breeding ground for bad trials and problem of bias and corruption.  Thus, the law gives the defendant the right to an attorney. The right to a trained legal expert who knows what’s going on and what is the best defense to give. The right to someone there on your side, making sure the system is as fair as it can be.

By risking the possibility that lawyers won’t take on this kind of work, the State is risking the fact that the system isn’t going to work anymore. No lawyers means no right to an attorney. No right to an attorney means that an unprepared defendant is facing down highly trained legal experts from the state in a state-based trial system. It’s a situation just asking for inefficiency and unfair decisions to abound.  

Lawyers aren’t asking the state to pay out a fortune for this type of work, but neither can they afford to do the work when it costs more than they make.  Especially, the young solo practitioners who traditionally take on this type of work. It simply isn’t feasible.  $400/hr is not necessary, but enough to cover costs is.  And $25/hr simply isn’t it.

 

 

Dropping Bar Examination Passage Statistics

21 Apr

Picture From GoatMilkBlog

It appears that the rumors may be true – the possibility of passing your state bar exam is getting more difficult.

In 2013, I was one of the thousands of bar-takers crossing my fingers and praying for that lucky answer on the test that would push me into the much-needed title of “Current Lawyer.”  With increasing debt (13% interest rate on my $250,000 in loans), the desperate need for experience (most employers want 2 years of experience or more before paying you), and a desperation to escape the hell that was bar study, it seemed like everything was resting on this score.

Law is one of those dreadful career choices, like medicine, that pretty much requires that you pass the exam if you want to work in the field. If you can’t pass the test, you can’t get the job.

By the time you take the bar exam, you are wiped out. Done in, done for, done to – there is simply nothing left inside of you to give.  The exam is the pinnacle of 3 years of never-ending stress and agony. Your relationships won’t handle much more strain or lost time. Your finances are collapsing (the exam itself costs as much as $5,000) and you literally have pennies in the bank. Your job options are somewhat bleak with a good score; without it, you suddenly worry that you will never work in law again.  And perhaps the worst, your brain and soul simply is done. I remember leaving the test and watching several people around me basically crying from just the weariness that hits you. For four years, your life has been one big war and waiting game – battling for the best grades and waiting to learn if it was all for nothing.  

And then the wait begins again. 1 Month for some (e.g. North Carolina). 3-4 Months for others (e.g. Rhode Island, California).  One by one the scores are released and we find out if we are moving on in the game or stuck back at square one.  It’s a difficult experience.

And now, it just got harder. 

The scores are out for dozens of states, and the trend isn’t looking good. 

Since 2013, I have been recording and sharing both the Bar Exam Results information and Passage Rates of the states that publish them.

The 2015 rates show a distinct falling pattern – EVERY state that publishes statistics has shown a drop from last year’s February results.  Many are at the lowest they’ve been since I started recording them, July or February.  And some states are simply not reporting as they usually do (e.g. North Carolina)

We noticed a similar trend last year, as many legal sites and writers questioned if this was an oddity or a sign of future falls. For example, last year Illinois showed such a drop that the bar association had to questions its decision to raise the minimum passing score in 2015. (1).  California had their lowest passage rate in 10 years on the July 2014 exam. (3) The students and bloggers grew concerned (2, 4). And it appears those fears have been realized on the February 2015 exam. 

The results are obvious – the passage rates are all down at this point. 21 states have reported results, 12 have reported passage statistics. Of those twelve, all have seen drops in their scores. 

And the move to the Uniform Bar Exam isn’t stopping the decline.  The UBE states are also reporting statistics, and theirs have fallen too. Washington is down to 65%, Kansas down to 81%, Idaho down to 72%. Once again, they are all below last year’s rate. 

It depends on who you ask as to the reason behind the fall.

 Students and many law schools are arguing that the problem is on the side of the Bar Associations who administer the test. They claim that the State bar exam associations are either A) making the exam questions more difficult (e.g. Civil Procedure was added to the exam) or B) making the Scoring more selective (as in Illinois).  

On the other hand, the Bar Associations claim that the students are simply stupider now than they were before (5). In a memo to Law School Deans in October, Erica Moeser, President of the NCBE (Bar Exam Creator), said that “the group that sat in July 2014 was less able than than the group that sat in July 2013.” (5) They also tried blaming falling numbers of takers. 

Regardless of the reason, the students are getting the bad end of this terrible lollipop.  

Bar Results are Out!

30 Mar

So North Carolina has officially begun mailing out their bar results. They aren’t available online yet, but hopefully will be soon. However, I’m getting confirmation from some people that they have received theirs in the mail.  So keep your fingers crossed. I’ll be checking consistently now to see if those states without dates have posted, so watch the site!

GOOD LUCK! And Congrats to all who passed!

🙂